Welcome to Delancey Street. If your daily MCA payment is eating more than your business makes in a day, you already know something is broken. But you probably don't know how broken. Or what your actual options are.
How does this happen in the first place?
It happens faster than most business owners expect. Here's the math that nobody explains to you at closing:
You took a $100,000 MCA with a 1.4 factor rate. That means you owe $140,000 back. The term is 6 months. Your daily payment is roughly $1,100 per day, five days a week. When you signed, your business was depositing $4,000–$5,000 a day. The payment felt manageable. Tight, but manageable.
Then revenue dipped. Maybe you lost a contract. Maybe it's seasonal. Maybe you stacked a second MCA on top of the first one (this is the single fastest way to end up underwater, and funders know it, which is why they do it anyway). Now you're depositing $2,000 a day and your combined MCA payments are $1,800. You're running your entire business — payroll, rent, inventory, insurance — on $200 a day.
That's not a business. That's a countdown.
What happens when the ACH exceeds your bank balance?
The debit bounces. And then it gets worse:
- NSF fees stack immediately. Your bank charges you $30–$35 per failed transaction. The MCA lender charges you a returned payment fee on top of that. If they retry the ACH (and they will, usually 2–3 times), you're looking at $150+ in fees from a single day's missed payment. Multiply that by a week and you're hemorrhaging money you don't have on payments you already can't make.
- The lender flags your account internally. Most MCA companies have automated systems that flag accounts after 2–3 consecutive NSFs. Once you're flagged, you're moved from "active" to "collections-adjacent." The calls start. The tone changes.
- You're now in technical default. This is the part people don't understand — you don't have to formally miss a payment to be in default. Under most MCA agreements, any disruption to the expected ACH flow is a default trigger. NSF counts. Changing your bank account counts. Reducing your processing volume counts. The agreement is written to give the funder maximum leverage the moment anything deviates from what they expected.
- The funder can accelerate the full balance. Once you're in default, the remaining purchased amount (everything you still owe, not just tomorrow's payment) becomes due in full. Immediately. So your $1,100 daily problem just became a $90,000 lump-sum problem. Overnight.
Can you negotiate lower payments with an MCA funder?
You can try. But here's what actually happens in practice:
Most MCA funders will not voluntarily reduce your daily payment. The contract doesn't require them to. Unlike a traditional loan, there's no regulatory body forcing them to offer hardship accommodations. The MCA is structured as a purchase of future receivables, not a loan — and that distinction means you have almost none of the protections you think you have.
Some funders will agree to a temporary reduction if you can prove (with bank statements, P&L, tax returns) that your revenue has genuinely dropped. But "temporary" usually means 2–4 weeks, and they'll often tack on additional fees for the modification. You're paying for the privilege of paying less.
And here's the part that should concern you: if you have multiple MCAs, reducing one payment doesn't fix the problem. The other funders are still debiting. They don't coordinate. They don't care about each other. Each one is acting independently to protect their own position, which means you're negotiating with 3 or 4 parties who all want first access to the same depleted bank account.
What are your actual options?
This depends on how far gone you are. Be honest with yourself about where you sit:
If you're still current but the payments are unsustainable — you have the most leverage right now, and it's shrinking by the day. This is the window to bring in an attorney-backed debt settlement firm (like us) to restructure the obligations before you're in default. Once you default, the funder's lawyers get involved and your negotiating position drops significantly.
If you've already missed payments — the clock is running. The funder is likely already considering acceleration, UCC enforcement, or a confession of judgment filing (if your agreement included one, and most do). You need legal intervention, not a phone call to the funder's customer service line. Their "workout department" is not there to help you. It's there to collect.
If your accounts have been frozen or you've been served — you're in litigation territory. A restraining order or account freeze can happen within 24–48 hours in states like New York. At this stage you need a lawyer who specializes in MCA defense, immediately. Not next week. Not after you "figure things out."
The mistake most business owners make
They wait. They think the situation will improve next month. They think revenue will bounce back. They think the funder will work with them if they just explain the situation.
The funder will not work with you. The funder is a business, and their business model depends on collecting the purchased amount as fast as possible, with maximum fees attached. Every day you wait, the balance grows, the fees accumulate, and your leverage shrinks.
Short answer: If your MCA payments are exceeding your daily revenue, the math doesn't fix itself. It gets worse. The only question is whether you deal with it now — while you still have options — or later, when the funder's attorneys are making the decisions for you.
At Delancey Street, we settle MCA debt for business owners who are exactly where you are right now. Attorney-owned, which means we fight on legal grounds, not with phone calls. If you're drowning in daily payments, let's talk before the funders decide the conversation is over.